Cheap 1st Birthday Tutu Outfits

Then the last two deliveries of informative ISA:

Mexico City, July 16, 2008 No.
Information Service. 478

http://serviciodenoticiasisa.blogspot.com

Contents: I.
Lists the questions for consultation on energy reform
II. López Obrador invited to vote in the energy consulting
III. In the consultation of 27: no privatization, Laura Itzel Castillo

---------------
LIST OF QUESTIONS FOR CONSULTATION ON ENERGY REFORM
(published in El Sendero del Peje-printed-on July 16, 2008)

The group of experts who formed the government, the Legislature and the Instituto Federal Electoral District (IEDF) presented two questions for the public consultation on energy reform to be held on 27 July.


The questions are: "Currently the exploitation, transport, distribution, storage and refining of oil are exclusive of government activities. Do you agree or disagree that these activities can now engage private companies? "

The second is:" In general you agree or disagree with the adoption of reform initiatives on energy currently being debated in Congress? "

At the event, where the representative of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Beatriz Vázquez, read the two questions for the Secretary of Federal District Government, Juan José García, reminded that the consultation will be from 8:00 to 18:00.

detail that is established two thousand 841 polling stations in parks, gardens, stations of the Metro Public Transport System and four electronic voting machines in Alameda Park, the Zocalo, the Glorieta Insurgentes, and Chapultepec.

García Ochoa also announced that in the coming hours will be announced the call for those wishing to participate as responsible for tables, so that they go to the district coordination of IEDF and apply for registration, training and designation.

added that will be sent to print the number of ballots sufficient for citizens to have the opportunity to cast their vote.

In turn, the president of IEDF, Isidro Cisneros, recalled they established an agreement with the Legislature and local government for public consultation, since they are convinced issues having to do with the participation of citizens, promotion of culture and promotion.

IEDF said the advice to the organizers on organization stationery design and the definition of the question was a proposal to which scholars have elements according to the experience of the electoral body, in preparation for public consultations .

IEDF Cisneros said the nine suggestions raised to serve on the committee responsible for drafting the questions and In all cases, they were respected and fulfilled; also proposed 10 criteria reagents for the preparation of questions, which were accepted equally.

regard, the representative of the UNAM, Beatriz Vázquez, said the academic work was to check that impartiality and objectivity have questions, considering the bill sent to lawmakers.

The meeting was also attended by representatives of the IPN, UAM, the local congressman Humberto Morgan, who at the end of the presentation of the questions visited the city government chief, Marcelo Ebrard, in their offices. ---------------


CONSULTATION CALLS VOTE ENERGY OBRADOR
(published in The Path of Peje-printed-on July 16, 2008)

In an interview with Radio W, Lopez Obrador said: "I will call you wimp and thief, but there are many synonyms" seeks a trade fair, if you accept to discuss with him about energy reform.

substitute journalist Carmen Aristegui, Carlos Puig, argued that the condition was a challenge, Calderon AMLO had not insulted, to which Obrador said, "No, I just stole the presidency. As we are entitled to, we 18 months of a great wrong, without violence, has not broken a glass in this country, and we can not even take the blame. So it is not true that I leave government. Actually he has had a lot of freedom to do things, if you have not done is because they wanted to or could not by ineptitude. "

Regarding the public consultation on energy reform, López Obrador called on the people of Mexico to get out and vote on 27 July. Andrés Manuel said it would be possible a peaceful citizen mobilization, the energy bill approved by the Executive and Mexico called the people out to vote on 27 July.

Carlos Puig was incisive and asked if he expected to take Obrador an airport and said: "We can not know, there is the siege of the media. We must seek effective strategies that do not affect others, but it is sturdy. We are thousands across the country. " He added that there are sufficient resources to build oil refineries and exploit robes and pointed to large companies that do not pay all their taxes. He

know Bimbo pays 1% or 2%, according to public information, it asked the Federal Institute of Access to Information (IFAI) data on how much they pay tax large companies such as Telmex and Cemex, which he said no pay more than 2%, 1% 3%. Also, he said, is bringing in more money than ever into the country by selling oil abroad. "The problem we have is that there is much misinformation on the part of the Treasury and the Government. Carstens, who is a whiz in public money away, said that there was no surplus. It's amazing, common sense, if we're getting nearly double what Congress had established, how there is no surplus, then claimed that all goes to subsidizing gasoline. "

"We have information from the first quarter, where in the case of Magna, is 30 cents a difference between what the government buys foreign gasoline and how to sell it at gas stations. The Premium is almost a weight. Then argued that did not include transportation costs. We have done the calculation, and transport costs seven cents. "

argued that the intention is to privatize Pemex, have led the industry to fail, "how do you explain that they have not built a new refinery in 25 years?". And although there is one in Texas, said that "instead of investing here, took their money abroad. In the case of petrochemicals was worse, left it to become scrap. There is a deliberate abandonment of Pemex. Nothing has damaged more in Mexico than the dishonesty of the rulers. Is the main cause of social inequality. The worst of the thieves is the corrupt politician. "

respect to the claims of the PAN government, said seeking the privatization "because they believe they can. There are many interests, some oil is grouped many interests. No political intelligence in Calderon. They are trying to trick the Constitution with amendments to secondary legislation. Also anything that leads to privatization, and yes lots and lots of corruption. Mouriño Calderon made private contracts, we have evidence is the case of Repsol, which brings oil from Peru. Many do not know who is proposing a management board 15 people, Calderon proposed a 10 and 5, will the union, which will have broad powers, are able to award contracts without competition and is proposing that these same members have bonds and insurance so that if they found no fraud or corruption they can do anything, "he said. --------------


CONSULTATION ON 27: NO TO THE PRIVATIZATION
by Laura Itzel Castillo
(published in The Graphic on July 16, 2008)

When approach generates a disproportionate reactions and responses of the opponent, it means that the proposal or idea touched heartstrings and, therefore, the promoter was correct in his plan.

That's what happened yesterday, the disclosure of the two questions that make the city government in the referendum of July 27, the organization of which involved the Electoral Institute of the Federal District on the proposed energy reform Calderón.

official and unofficial spokesmen tore his clothes and talked about manipulation, immediately after the questions were made public. It is important to clarify that in the formulation of these experts from various academic institutions, and to them is who is disqualifying.

usurper government really is afraid, as different Polls show that a high proportion of the population wants to be consulted, and that a solid majority oppose his initiatives.

In any case, if anything could mislead the participants are the two questions themselves, but a definition contained in the first: "government" instead of "nation" as the Constitution. The noun can benefit the privatization, as the rejection of the Calderon administration of a part of society, especially the high marginality can lead stakeholders to vote counter to their wishes.

What are the questions for consultation of 27? The following: 1) "Currently, the exploitation, transportation, distribution, storage and refining are exclusive of government activities. Do you agree or disagree involving private companies? ". And 2) "Do you agree or disagree with the adoption of energy reform initiatives being debated in Congress?".

Social Communication Office of Pemex said that private companies involved in the oil industry for 70 years, but only provided details of the PAN governments: between January 2000 and July 2008, Pemex Exploration and Production held almost 40,000 contracts, mostly private companies. In otras palabras, reconoció que ya actúan ilegalmente.

El artículo 27 constitucional es claro: “Tratándose del petróleo y de los carburos de hidrógeno sólidos o gaseosos o de minerales radioactivos, no se otorgarán concesiones ni contratos ni subsistirán los que, en su caso, se hayan otorgado y la nación llevará a cabo la explotación de esos productos, en los términos que señale la ley reglamentaria respectiva”.

Por eso, vamos por el ¡No! Primero paremos esta intentona privatizadora con razones y acciones, siempre pacíficas, pero de la magnitud necesaria. Después, rescatemos a Pemex de los neoliberales sin nación.

----------------------------------------------------------------------->

Mexico City, June 15, 2008 No.
Information Service. 477

http://serviciodenoticiasisa.blogspot.com

Contents: I.

The export of failure, by Laura Itzel Castillo

II. AMLO will visit 19 cities this week
Coahuila
-----------

EXPORT OF FAILURE
by Laura Itzel Castillo
(published in the supplement "Focus" the newspaper Reforma on July 13 , 2008)

Instead of solving the grave problem of nonperforming loans and evictions has been increasing in Mexico, Felipe Calderon plans to export to Central America our housing model, which extend to the entire region growing social conflict here has meaning. The $ 33 million that Mexico will contribute to the construction of housing, according to official announcement, it's just a hook for allegedly benefited nations import this type of housing, in addition to being an agent of environmental degradation and agricultural sectors excluded poor and only favors the private builders.

In fact, the Mexican housing model is not proper. Corresponds to a set policies imposed from abroad in the last three decades. As a result, according to the International Monetary Fund, the national economy has been placed behind Latin America and the Caribbean. Thus, for 2007 and 2008 our country will register an average growth of 3 percent, while the economies of the countries of this region will grow at a rate of 5 percent.

In housing the changes have been profound. The same in financial regulation in the regulations governing the sector agencies. They lost their social status that gave rise to and became banks. Thus, the Mexican government went from being a promoter of rooms at a single facilitator or intermediary, which favors private entities, real estate and transnational monopolies that profit from the overdue mortgage.

several years, right implanted in Mexico the same mortgage scheme that has plunged the United States and much of the world's financial institutions, real estate capital in a crisis. It is public and private loans to individuals whose borrowing capacity is zero or low: the so-called subprime or credit risk. These loans neutrons, as named by the prominent American economist James K. Galbraith (because they destroy families) have generated a crisis of such magnitude that at the end of June the U.S. Senate had to approve a State guarantee for about 300 billion dollars, in order to stop the wave of lawsuits against debtors and prevent more than 500 000 people in this country lose their homes.

This model property intended for export to Central America (with 50 thousand shares of housing in a first stage and 500 thousand in the long run) has been a total failure in the United States and Mexico. Here it has also become a growing social problem. I quote some examples: 1. According to INEGI, in October 2007, 14 percent of households in the country, ie 4.3 million, were uninhabited.

2. In June 2007, Infonavit nonperforming loans was 110 thousand credits. By May this year, the number of broken credits amounted to 130 thousand. This is by design commercial loans, which makes them unaffordable, and rising unemployment.

3. The problem is not unique to Infonavit. This is a general crisis. According to the Ministry of Finance, the financial system performing loans increased 2 billion Mexican pesos in three months, putting in 27 thousand 200 million pesos in March this year. Of this, 9 billion is for the mortgage banking.

4. Another indicator of social failure of this policy is the increasing number of settlements throughout the country. There is no comprehensive vision of urban development and therefore not guaranteed land reserve or allocation of land to the needy. According Corett, there are 53 million people who do not have deeded property and every year up to 300 000 households in urban areas, of which 125 000 occupy the land illegally. This is due largely to the new development that control the market in Mexico (Homex, Sare, Geo, Ara, Urbi and others) account for much of the floor of the main cities.

Some managers of these companies have previously served as government officials. Such is the case of Galician Tembleque David Sanchez, who as deputy finance Infonavit, sold 55 thousand credits to 2 corporations and grew up 900 percent to the company Homex, which, incidentally, later became manager. If we add that the developers receive subsidies through the Federal Mortgage Society, then we explain the growth of a thousand 118 percent, according to the Habita index of the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores. Is that why the directors of these corporations were present at the ceremony where it was renamed the aborted project Plan Puebla Panama and Mesoamerica? --------------



VISIT AMLO Coahuila 19 CITIES THIS WEEK

The weekly trips made Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Mexico's legitimate president, which include touch each and every one of the municipalities, this week will lead to preside information meetings in 19 municipalities Coahuila state, where organized representation of the government headed and encourage participation in the referendum on energy reform.

The pipeline will have the following program:

Thursday July 17, 2008 10:00 am Rally at
Viesca (Ejido Scrooge) 11:45
Meeting in Matamoros (Ejido Coyote)
Rally 17:00 Wet Sierra

Friday July 18, 2008 10:30 am
Ocampo Rally at 12:00
Rally at 13:20 hours Cuatro Cienegas

Lamadrid Rally at Meeting in Sacramento 16:00 17:15
Rally Swimmers at 18:30
Meeting in San Buenaventura

Saturday July 19, 2008 10:00
Meeting in Candela
Rally at Brown 12:30 14:00

Border Rally Rally at 16:30 pm Abasolo
17:45 Meeting in Escobedo (Ejido Primero de Mayo) 19:15
Meeting in Progress

Sunday July 20, 2008 10:00
Meeting in Melchor Muzquiz
11:30
Meeting in Nueva Rosita 12:45 pm Sabinas
rally 14:30 pm Rally at Juarez


Zany means: THE PEOPLE ARE NOT DUMB!